Project Controls
The problem
Seeing true cost, schedule, and risk performance across a program — not just red/yellow/green status slides that lag reality by weeks.
Project controls teams on capital programs are often working from cost, schedule, and risk data that lives in separate tools and gets reconciled manually into a monthly report — by the time it's reviewed, it describes where the project was, not where it is. Owners increasingly require standardized, auditable performance measurement (Earned Value Management is the industry-standard example) precisely because subjective percent-complete estimates and status-color roll-ups hide problems until they're expensive to fix.
The NexBixi approach
NexBixi's Project Delivery & Controls capability group keeps cost, schedule, and risk data connected to the same underlying work-breakdown and schedule structure, so performance indices reflect actual, current progress rather than a manually reconciled snapshot.
This is deliberately built around established project-controls discipline — Earned Value Management, structured work packaging — rather than a proprietary scoring system, so the numbers mean the same thing they would in any EPC/EPCM contractual reporting context.
What to expect
Performance data that reflects current reality closely enough to support corrective action, instead of a lagging monthly report.